 |
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/covid...ter-series
Covid Myth Buster Series
Debunking the COVID narrative with observation, facts, data, and rigorous scientific method
COVID "Myth Buster" series
My friend Marc Girardot has written a series of 9 COVID myth buster articles designed for the average layperson to understand. They may not convert a blue to a red pill however.
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/a...an-produce
Any Severe Covid Patient Can Produce More Virus Than All The Children in America Combined
Dangerous Children Myth - Children were never a danger to society - Covid Myth Buster
For my first post on Substack, I wanted to debunk one of the most preposterous assertions of Team Apocalypse: The fallacy that children are a danger to society and to grandma. I will demonstrate it’s quite the contrary.
I will not dive into the rationale for the intolerable crime against humanity committed on our children throughout the world these past two years.
Is it senescent leaders afraid of dying who were ready to throw our kids under the bus?
Is it simply a smokescreen because kids are defenceless?
Is it an additional way to create panic in parents?
The fact is that children have been accused of being the principal source of SARS-COV-2 and have been outrageously bullied because of that. It is ironic that those who feel at peace bullying our children are often the same righteous people who were tutoring against bullying practices at school a few years ago…
The reality is that collectively children are least prone to propagating a toxic dose of SARS-COV-2: they carry the smallest viral load for the shortest duration. In fact, it is certain healthy1 children produce exponentially less than very elderly/sick persons with delayed immune responses.
I had addressed this extensively in my August article: “A Novel Perspective on a Not So Novel Virus”, highlighting the many differences in propagation dynamics between children and adults, summarised in the scheme below, and explaining why children can be natural vaccines more than anything else.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...76x722.png
But, I hadn’t taken the time to prove how dramatic the difference was between a child mildly sick for a couple of days and an elderly carrying the virus for weeks.
In fact, a simple mathematical calculation using this duration and the SC2 propagation speed is sufficient to demonstrate the reality of who is poisonous to whom. And spoiler alert, it’s not the children.
THE REALITY IS THAT ONE SINGLE SEVERE COVID PATIENT CAN PRODUCE MORE VIRUS THAN ALL CHILDREN IN AMERICA. THAT’S FACTUAL.
Even considering infecting doses are the same - which we know they aren’t because LTCF patients cross-infect each other with very heavy inocula - a huge difference lies in the exponential propagation left untouched by the immune system in ageing or sick patients.
A recent study 2 estimated that the reproduction yield of SARS-COV-2 in the body to be 10x per 36/48 hours. In other words, a delay of 12 days in the immune reaction vs children could account for expansion - adjusting for obesity acceleration and for ACE2 differential - of nearly 100 million times. And that’s not adjusted for higher and repeated doses 100-1000x inocula…
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...00x371.png
In other words, all the healthy kids in America - distributed across the country - cannot together ever produce the amount of one single severe patient dying of COVID, let alone LTCF patients surrounded with hundreds of elderly each producing high viral loads.
Not only are kids not producing anywhere near what an immuno-senescent sick elderly produces, but they are widely dispersed and therefore the toxic consequences on the community cannot be not compared.
To give you a comparison how ridiculous the policies against children are:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...18x982.png
This is all the more infuriating when you see pictures of elderly politicians - all with dwindling health - ie ready-to-start virus mass-production machine- feasting unmasked while forcing on kids measures they don’t even apply to themselves…
The focus should always have been on limiting the viral expansion, both at an individual level - through protocols3 to reduce propagation - and at a community level - through focused protection4 - notably within the retirement homes and hospitals.
There never was any rationale to limit the everyday lives of children, to gag them, to close down schools, to have them s
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...70x992.png
Frankly, it all seems to have emerged from the dark minds of seriously deranged individuals with a lot of hate or fear in them. We might need to review who is taking care of our children in the years to come…mass hysteria cannot justify this level of inhumanity.
IN THE US, IN GERMANY AND IN SWEDEN5, NOT ONE HEALTHY CHILD DIED OF COVID IN 2 YEARS: ZERO !!
There never was any ethical or moral justification to impose anything on children. Children were never at risk with COVID. Imposing hardship on them was not only reckless, but utterly morally wrong as they have no possibility of consenting to these nightmarish measures. The idea that kids should sacrifice their lives - or their health - to bring peace of mind to a generation in age of dying is an enormous cognitive dissonance born out of a civilisation that has lost its bearings. Grand-parents and parents are here to protect children. That’s the way of the world, not the other way around.
I’d encourage many to view the Justice videos6 of Professor Michael Sandel at Harvard. We, as a civilisation, have failed the litmus test in a grand way, and have a serious need for a moral recalibration.
1
Not immunocompromised
2
“The total number and mass of SARS-CoV-2 virion” by Ron Sender, PNAS, June 2021
3
Source: Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
4
Source: The Great Barrington Declaration
5
“Sweden and Germany: No Deaths In Children Due to Covid” by Paul Elias Alexander
6
“Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do?” by Michael Sandel
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/v...neffective
The Broken Vaccine Promise ...
Vaccine Effectiveness Myth (Part 1)- Vaccines are Ineffective to those who need it most - Covid Myth Buster News
A Broken Promise - Invisible in plain sight
Some of you might have read “The Invisible Gorilla”, or seen the video where most of us, as we focus our attention to counting the number of ball passes completely miss out on the striking presence of a gorilla running around students !!
http://www.theinvisiblegorilla.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo&t=1s
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...8x499.jpeg
Reading this book will make you less sure of yourself—and that’s a good thing. In The Invisible Gorilla, Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons, creators of one of psychology’s most famous experiments, use remarkable stories and counterintuitive scientific findings to demonstrate an important truth: Our minds don’t work the way we think they do. We think we see ourselves and the world as they really are, but we’re actually missing a whole lot. Chabris and Simons combine the work of other researchers with their own findings on attention, perception, memory, and reasoning to reveal how faulty intuitions often get us into trouble. In the process, they explain: • Why a company would spend billions to launch a product that its own analysts know will fail• How a police officer could run right past a brutal assault without seeing it• Why award-winning movies are full of editing mistakes• What criminals have in common with chess masters• Why measles and other childhood diseases are making a comeback• Why money managers could learn a lot from weather forecasters Again and again, we think we experience and understand the world as it is, but our thoughts are beset by everyday illusions. We write traffic laws and build criminal cases on the assumption that people will notice when something unusual happens right in front of them. We’re sure we know where we were on 9/11, falsely believing that vivid memories are seared into our minds with perfect fidelity. And as a society, we spend billions on devices to train our brains because we’re continually tempted by the lure of quick fixes and effortless self-improvement. The Invisible Gorilla reveals the myriad ways that our intuitions can deceive us, but it’s much more than a catalog of human failings. Chabris and Simons explain why we succumb to these everyday illusions and what we can do to inoculate ourselves against their effects. Ultimately, the book provides a kind of x-ray vision into our own minds, making it possible to pierce the veil of illusions that clouds our thoughts and to think clearly for perhaps the first time.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H8vPQqD...yH0Ys/view
Like magicians misdirecting attention and using the audience’s own biases, vaccine manufacturers have literally managed hiding in plain site their biggest fraud: these vaccines don’t protect those they were supposed to protect in the first place: the very frail, the very old, those that can end up in the hospital. It’s physiologically impossible.
And, to be honest, they even admit it with their own pre-baked argument: “Vaccines can’t be 100% effective!”. What they purposely forget to tell you is that they diluted the frail folks - the core beneficiaries of the vaccines - with many more healthier folks who typically recover from a SC2 infection seamlessly, often without symptoms, and never needed the vaccine.
After months of scaremongering - those of us who were at first concerned about our ageing parents, ended up scared to death for our own lives and that of our children, and craving for the reassurance that the vaccines will save us. That’s when the attention shifted from the gorilla “your very frail aren’t protected by the vaccine” to the basketball “Thank God, I can vaccinate my kid!” … All for a peace of mind against an artificially created anxiety: your kid never needed a vaccine for this virus. As Teller of the magic duo Penn & Teller says “The strongest lie is the lie that the audience tells itself”. In other words, nobody wanted the vaccines not to work, and so the Gorilla - here the vaccine failing our frailest - disappeared from thin air…
Do you see the trick? If you are healthy, your immune system will react normally, you never needed the vaccine in the first place. But those who are most in danger, those whose immune is very low, those whose immune is compromised, no vaccine would ever work for them. It’s a no brainer everyone learns in Vaccinology 101.
Do you see the scam now? The travesty of science? This would be like a French teacher bringing in a majority of native speakers from France to his/her class to show how great a teacher he/she is. And to say pointing to a few English speakers: “You always have a few bad apples”, and everybody would agree… The reality is this is snake-oil selling of the worst sort.
The original vaccine promise from health authorities and the pharmaceutical industry was to come and rescue the elderly and the sick who are the principal victims of COVID-19. These victims are essentially very old and with multiple co-morbidities; the underlying clinical reality is they have a delayed immune response, they are immunocompromised. Thus these folks are being betrayed; they are not protected by current vaccines, and never will be, at least until we find a way to fix their immune system.
In a well articulated document, the 500 doctors of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance highlighted that the clinical trials didn’t address the population most in need for these vaccines. The demographics of the trials should have been consistent with the “at risk” population age - 85% are above 75, not 4% ! - and the co-morbidity distribution: 4 on average ! The vaccines should have been tested on people with multiple co-morbidities and a weak immune system, not the general healthy population. Evidently, the effectiveness results would have been very disappointing and the vaccine wouldn’t have been approved, that’s why vaccine manufacturers didn’t include many elderly and anyone immunocompromised…
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...2x1404.png
The Pfizer inoculations for COVID-19 - More harm than good
You don’t need a PhD in immunology or virology to understand that if your immune system is broken, vaccines that rely essentially on that very immune simply cannot work.
A vaccine without a solid immune is like a skyscraper without foundations…it will inevitably fail
Less than 1% of the population runs the risk of ending up in a life-threatening situation, because their immunes have very delayed responses1 that let the viral propagation run a free rampage.
Imagine your house is on fire, you call the fire department, but the message gets slowed down up to 64 times2. Instead of taking 5 minutes, the fire fighters get the message 5 hours later…and the answer is a cytokine storm, the whole house is on fire, if not totally burnt down.
The vaccine strategy to save our elderly was always doomed to fail. Using vaccines on frail individuals is like putting lipstick on a bulldog! Willingly or unwillingly, health authorities have lied to our elderly - and to us - by telling they would be protected. They always knew this fallacy, and that’s probably why they wanted everyone to be scared, focused on their own health and that of their children, putting a blind eye on the Gorilla: These vaccines don’t work for those that are most at risk.
I can already imagine aggressive comments on Long COVID, on lost days of work, on the pain, the fever, the headaches… and it’s understandable that someone healthy would want to choose to get vaccinated simply to avoid the bad experience. The thing is these vaccines won’t work in that case any better than for our most fragile…but for a different reason. (See Part 2)
In summary, vaccine manufacturers have become wicked magicians: they have managed creating a multi-billion market out of nothing without delivering any clinical value to those in need beyond relieving a fabricated anxiety. Even drug dealers at least deliver on the promise to get you high. If it weren’t so despicable and unethical, you’d have to applaud the marketing feat… Do you see the Gorilla now?
(See Part 2 - Vaccines Are Ineffective... Covid Myth Buster News)
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...6x369.jpeg
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/m...ut-nothing
Can a shot in the deltoid stimulate mucus in the airways? The answer is "No" ... Then, how can vaccines be effective?
Vaccine Effectiveness Myth (Part 2): A 30-year lie on misplaced vaccines - Covid Myth Buster News
In matters of vaccines, more than anything else, the devil is in the detail.
Vaccine effectiveness can be very binary and complete failure is quite easy. The immune system being a sophisticated bio-software; sensitivity is very strong. Every detail, every step of the way, is key: the area of injection, the injection tool, the immune context of the patient, the schedule … Where and how you inject the product can make or break the entire vaccine effectiveness.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x3392.jpeg
A few years back, I was fortunate enough to do a deep-dive into a next generation anti-cancer vaccine technology, advising a ground-breaking immune therapeutics company in Paris. As I was comparing their technology with competition, I remember being surprised at the effort, time and money they had dedicated to fine-tuning the delivery of the vaccine. We were talking years in additional development, and consequently millions of dollars invested, to test where and how to best deliver the vaccine.
Why? Why had they paid so much attention to the delivery, and not their competitors? Well, there was your attention to detail … and it sure paid off, the company ended up with response rates close to 90% when its competitors were achieving less than 10% … an enormous difference with the potential1 to save millions from cancer.
In the accelerated development of anti-COVID vaccines, the focus was essentially on developing the right “code” to transfer to the immune system, mainly on the relatively narrow Spike protein, as you all know by now. They also focused on the best delivery vehicle - the lipid nanoparticle - and optimal manufacturing processes. However, vaccine effectiveness depends on many other factors. A systems approach was needed, not a pinpoint solution approach. It’s not enough to find and to present the right antigens - with the right quality - to the immune system, even packed into the latest and greatest technology…
Unfortunately, after a year of vaccination and 9.5 billion doses, vaccine failure is visible to everybody to acknowledge: unforeseen transmission, explosion of cases… If you believe “Our World In Data”, we’ve had 240 million infections in 2021 - when we vaccinated like never before. We only had 70 million in 2020 when we had no vaccines...
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...8x1396.png
Either by media-induced panic, by sheer incompetence, or possibly by customary corruption, vaccine stakeholders have presented a completely false narrative on anti-COVID vaccine effectiveness.
For nearly a year now, I have been exposing two critical inconsistencies in terms of the location of the vaccine-induced immunity that make it nearly impossible for these vaccines to be effective:
How can an injection in the deltoid stimulate an immunity in the mucus?
Respiratory virus like SARS-COV-2 typically propagate in the mucus: mouth, nose, digestive tract and lungs. For propagation to be stopped in the mucus, notably in the lungs, a preemptive immune arsenal needs to be stimulated there. This is exactly what occurs once recovered from a natural infection: a sterilising immunity is provided by potent resident memory T and B-cells - along with neutralising IgA antibodies - that are positioned in large numbers as a sentinel force to kill in-the-egg any starting infection.
I have addressed this at length in my June article comparing natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity as well as in my August article on pre-existing immunity. I am not alone in thinking along these lines; many renowned scientists share a similar perspective that intramuscular vaccines cannot work for mucosal viruses:
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany in a recent article titled “ Why intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination must fail ” made that argument (see video).
Professor Edward J. Steele of Australia in a recent interview on Asia Pacific Today titled “The Origins Of Covid-19 & Why The Vaccines Don't Work” also made the same point.
Professor Michael W. Russell in the US hinted the same thing in an article “Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection”.
Already in 1992, McGhee et al in an article titled “The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development” had pointed to this fallacy.
“It is surprising that despite our current level of understanding of the common mucosal immune system, almost all current vaccines are given to humans by the parenteral 2 route. Systemic immunisation is essentially ineffective for induction of mucosal immune responses.” McGhee et al, 1992
Professor Akiko Iwasaki3 at Yale , in a very smart study, demonstrated that only a mucosal vaccine can be fully effective against sexual herpes because it stimulates mucosal resident memory T-cells. She and her team “paired”4 the blood flow of one naive mouse with an immune mouse with both resident and circulating T-cells. By doing so, she was able to compare the effectiveness of mucosal immunity vs systemic immunity, the naive mouse benefiting only of the circulating memory T-cells. Mucosal wins by and large. Circulating T-cells helped ultimately in a second stage, but in the case of SARS-COV-2 all adults have circulating memory T-cells because of cross-immunity5 from other common colds. In other words, if anti-COVID vaccines don’t create resident memory immunity in the mucus, they provide no to very limited value. This video will help you understand (32’).
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x1168.png
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x1168.png
In conclusion, it is very unlikely that any intramuscular vaccines can ever work to stop COVID; the vaccines are injected in the wrong location: the muscle, too far away from the virus entry point to stimulate any response there. This is not related to mRNA or DNA technologies, attenuated virus vaccines are also de facto ineffective.
This is simply a question of location of where the vaccine is delivered… And the fact that millions have been vaccinated against the flu in the arm every year for decades, most likely uselessly shouldn’t change this reality …
Given the emphasis of vaccine manufacturers and public health authorities on antibodies, you’re all probably thinking:
- “Hey Marc ?! What about neutralising antibodies?”
The question is: What can antibodies do to stop a propagation that is cell-to-cell?
To start, vaccine-induced antibodies are also misplaced … circulating in the blood away from the mucus. And, even if a few antibodies were to migrate to the mucus, they would very much be useless against a virus that propagates cell-to-cell (see picture below). Fundamentally, cell-to-cell propagation means the virus expansion happens out-of-reach of antibodies (at least before Omicron). Antibodies can’t bind with viruses that are inside cells, only T-cells can chase down virions inside cells by instructing infected cells to self-destruct…
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...4x1206.png
Cell-to-cell Propagation of SARS-COV-2 6
Imagine you want to catch someone when he gets out of a building, and he never does: he’s actually using tunnels from one building to the next. Well these vaccines are essentially useless because not only is the virus using tunnels, but you’re not even in the same town!
The virus is inside a Mucustown building while antibodies are outside a building in Bloodville!
Looks like a missed meeting to me. What do you think? …
1
In their Phase I trial, nearly 30% of the stage IV cancer patient who received the entire protocole survived more than 4 years
2
Parenteral: administered or occurring elsewhere in the body than the mouth and alimentary canal.
3
Pr Akiko Iwasaki is an Investigator of the HHMI and Waldemar Von Zedtwitz Professor of Department of Immunobiology, and of Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology at the Yale School of Medicine. Her research focuses on the mechanisms of immune defense against viruses at the mucosal surfaces.
4
Parabiosis combines two living organisms which are joined together surgically and develop single, shared physiological systems, here the blood flow.
5
Cross-immunity is an effective immunity granted from past infections with “cousin” viruses, a form of natural vaccination.
6
Source: Ultrastructural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 interactions with the host cell via high resolution scanning electron microscopy
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/w...d-go-wrong
What could go wrong?
Vaccine Safety Myth: Designed for the muscle, inadvertently shot in the bloodstream - Good or bad : what do you think? - Covid Myth Buster News
Often the most trivial detail is the most critical. Team Apocalypse partisans view the vaccines as Godly, nothing bad can ever occur. Team Reality partisans view the vaccines as Evil-like, everything is bad about these novel technologies. Today, I want to open a bridge between our teams. What if it wasn’t the vaccine the problem but the vaccination method? And what if hundreds of thousands had indeed died from a misplaced needle?
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x4000.jpeg
During a morning commute, roughly 30,000 car parts come into play to move you forward. Any specific failure can end up causing your death, or that of a passerby: a wheel breaking off, brakes malfunctioning …
When General Motors CEO, Mary Barra was summoned to the Capitol in 2014, she faced harsh criticism for 13 deaths caused by faulty ignition switches produced over a ten year period: 13 dysfunctional parts out of 3 trillion assembled parts justified summoning the CEO of one of the icons of corporate America, because safety is paramount…Right?
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/16/busin...ashes.html
Forward 7 years, adverse event data piling up in VAERS week after week since January 2021. Nearly 10,000 deaths…NOTHING. Is safety still paramount?…
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...4x1632.png
Why haven’t the CEOS of Pfizer and Moderna been summoned to Capitol Hill as was the GM CEO? We are not talking 13 people in 10 years, here! Why has the head of the FDA only been interviewed yesterday? More importantly, why hasn’t the vaccination been paused to investigate, find the root cause, correct and start back?
If you follow1 my friend Steve Kirsch or Jessica Rose, you know the VAERS under reporting factor is likely between 31 and 41.
So there’s a real possibility that the vaccination campaign killed 100 times more than 9/11 …
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x2730.jpeg
Even, if you believe there is no under reporting - which frankly would be delusional given the complexity of recording the data, the potential malpractice implications and the religiosity surrounding these vaccines - we would still be talking 3 times 9/11 !
The precautionary principle should have been activated long ago, simply to pause and to investigate the facts as in the past.
Let me run you through my high level root cause analysis, using proven facts as stepping stones.
What are some undeniable FACTS about these vaccines?
The mRNA and DNA anti-COVID vaccine are effective at getting the body to produce the Spike protein. Spike protein has been found in the blood of many vaccinated.
This means:
Vaccine lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are effective at penetrating human cells.
FACT 1
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x11024.png
The Moderna injection is composed 40 billion nanoparticles. The AstraZeneca of 50 billion. And the Pfizer is likely around 10-15 billion.
This means:
Vaccinated consent to having tens of billions of healthy muscular cells transformed into Spike production machinery and likely destroyed in the process !
FACT 2
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...00x553.png
So far 9.5 billion doses of vaccines have been injected, and one can only observe that many are doing fine. In general, these vaccines appear relatively safe in the short term.
This means:
It’s not the vaccines per se that are dangerous in the short term, it’s a combination of factors. If many people have been fine after the vaccine shots. why are some suffering major adverse events? Some other factor must be driving the adverse effects.
FACT 3
THE NUMBER OF ADVERSE EVENTS HAS SKYROCKETED IN 2021
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...00x800.png
with nearly 10,000 deaths reported in VAERS versus 150 in a typical year.
Normal VAERS post-vaccine report level is 0.4 deaths per million doses2 versus 19.1 for anti-COVID vaccines.
This means:
At a minimum3, these vaccines are 50 times more lethal than traditional ones.
De facto, anyone can observe that something is going on. It’s not a question of more vaccinations. You can go to this website to make up your opinion.
https://openvaers.com/covid-data
FACT 4
More than 50% of post-vaccine deaths reported seem to occur the very day they get the injection, or the next day.
This means:
Something brutal is happening very quickly to these people caused by the vaccines.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...00x800.png
Yesterday, Anthony Fauci, the head of the NAID, stated in the US Senate that these are everyday deaths such as car accidents…If that were true, if those were every day deaths, the number of reports would be a flat line around 50, basically it would be totally de-correlated to the date of vaccination. You can judge for yourself the above graph. Does it look de-correlated to you ?
FACT 5
In a recent study, Spiro Pantazatos of Columbia U determined a Vaccine Fatality Rate in the US of 459 death per million doses4, which would translates for 2021 to 235 thousand vaccine-induced death in the US alone. I personally believe it’s a conservative estimate.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x1644.png
2 shots + 1 booster = 0.15% fatality rate. Based on data from Singapour in 2020, that’s roughly 3 times higher than the untreated virus lethality rate!
This means:
The vaccination campaign has done more harm than the virus, and likely vaccine-induced COVID deaths have been confused with actual COVID deaths.
FACT 6
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x1452.png
Thanks to the FOIA request to the Japanese authorities of my good friend
Dr. Byram Bridle, we are aware of the bio-distribution study undertaken by Pfizer.
The study shows that Lipid Nano Particles can escape the muscle and penetrate many organs and transfect healthy cells across the body including the spleen, the liver, the brain…
This means:
Healthy cells like endothelial cells or heart cells can be transfected. This is of massive importance. These vaccines are meant to be intra-muscular by design, transfecting and messing around with a muscle cells isn’t consequential as muscle cell can regenerate. Transfecting cells that cannot regenerate such as myocytes (heart cells) is a recipe for disaster.
FACT 7
A few years back, WHO changed injection practices, and cancelled a decades-old practice called “the aspiration technique”that was meant to avoid injecting intravenously an intramuscular product.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x1262.png
This means:
A higher percentage of injections are going - partially or entirely - into the blood flow, directing the LNPs in areas they were never intended to go. Who in their right mind would want brain cells or heart cells to produce spike proteins?
FACT 8
Two leading Universities in Hong Kong and in Munich undertook to study the respective impact of intravenous injections (IV) of the vaccines. They found drastic differences between intramuscular and intravenous injections, IV mimicking precisely the generation of myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombocytopenia, hepatocyte and myocyte degeneration/necrosis…They also found T-cells attacking heart cells! And the pericardium calcified… Wondering why these athletes are falling like flies: their heart are literally stoned in.
A comparative study between Norway - who dropped the aspiration technique - and Denmark - who uses it - highlighted that Norway had 2.4 times more myocarditis than Denmark. QED
This means:
It is the combination :
on one side, of novel technologies that turn your own cells into antigen factories and triggers an immune reaction to destroy all these cells;
and, on the other side, the abandonment of a decades-old injection technique to ensure an intramuscular product isn’t accidentally shot into the blood stream,
that causes these massive advert events and explains the Safe/Unsafe conundrum.
FACT 9
View Dr. Campbell’s video for more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBaIRm4610o
In the blood stream, the first cells to be transfected by LNPs are the endothelial cells that make up the walls of our blood vessels. Probabilistically, it’s when the diameter is reduced that this will happen most, along with cells of vital organs around.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...86x760.png
This means:
Transfected endothelial cells will also be attacked by T-cells, bleeding will occur, inflammation, clotting, necrosis will follow when cells are not nourished by the blood. This is very much in line with very high levels of D-Dimers in the blood, and with vaccine-induced diseases observed: strokes, heart attacks, thrombocytopenia, blindness…
FACT 10
As often in root cause analyses, 1 single change doesn’t seem important here. But 2 simultaneous changes make the explosion. If you still believe you need a booster shot, have a read at my “Much Ado About Nothing” article? After that, if you still want the shot, just make sure the “Aspiration Technique” is used! And share the info!
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/m...ut-nothing
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x720.jpeg
It is now very clear to me this has been self inflicted from A to Z. But the vaccine collective hysteria has been a disaster for millions of families. Why have politicians and public health officials been dragging their feet - or putting a blind eye - is beyond me. Do they realise the human disaster that has occurred on their watch? Do they not realise people are waking up? …
1
If you don’t, you should.
2
3.6 bn vaccine doses injected in the USA between 2006 and 2016 (source: CDC)
3
Every thing else being equal
4
146,988 deaths estimated for 338.4 million doses between February and August
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/w...y-infected
Was New York actually infected at 83% by May 2020?
Infection Fatality Myth: In May 2020, we had data and analyses that showed the infection fatality rate of COVID was around 0.1%, and that New York had passed herd immunity - Covid Myth Buster News
This article dates back to May 2020. It’s my first article. I wanted to share it with you. I took a lot of flack for stating early IFR was 0.1%. I stand by what I wrote then. Built on solid data, the article has aged well. I wanted to appease the fear I saw around me. Almost 2 years later, I am still working hard at it… I hope you enjoy it.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x344.jpeg
May 2020, Paris - I wanted to share with some of you what I believe happened in NYC with Covid. I collected a series of tangible verifiable data points and some excellent research and tried to make some sense out of it. The data point to a possible infection of more than 83% of New Yorkers since early January: 70% would have been asymptomatic and didn't feel a thing, and 13% would have had actual symptoms: fever, headaches...
Building on the incredible online thermometer data provided by Kinsa Insight, I started from - what I saw in the data - was the peak of the pandemic on March 18: an approximately 4% of outlier in "% of ill" in the whole of NYC.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...34x952.png
Data from pregnant women delivering at the New York–Presbyterian Allen Hospital and Columbia University Irving Medical Center late March show 88% were asymptomatic (possibly their immune system is weakened by the foetus protecting HLA-G placental protein).
"In our area, which includes upper Manhattan and the Bronx, about 15 percent of patients who came to us for delivery tested positive for the coronavirus, but around 88 percent of these women had no symptoms of infection. That means 13.5 percent of all our patients during this time were infected with the coronavirus but weren’t exhibiting symptoms. " Washington Post by Dena Goffman and Desmond Sutton
Multiple research papers point to such high levels of asymptomaticity in urban environment (see research on undocumented infection in China). Closed environments like cruise ships or aircraft carriers, as well as retirement homes show lower levels of asymptomatic, most likely because of heavier load contamination and/or immune senescence.
Accounting for 85% of asymptomatic, that probably means that around 27% of New Yorkers were contaminated with Covid-19 that week! Even though it is based on temperature collected data, this is very much consistent with the contamination level found in pregnant women. This is also congruent with the claim of Professor Michael Levitt, Nobel Prize winner, Stanford School of Medicine, that the slowing pace of death at the time was indicative that the epidemic was reaching its peak.
I had now three solid factual bases to model the infected population in New York City; I then grossly simulated a skewed Gauss curve to compute weekly infection levels between early January and May 10.
Proxying for Covid-19 Mortality Rate
Last week, I spent some time trying to evaluate the actual mortality rate of Covid-19. The available data was pretty much useless as most countries haven't been testing much. And frankly - by the looks of it - the industrialisation of the testing technology and process - understandably - is still not very reliable.
I decided to try and figure out a way to proxy for data that - everything else being equal - would equate to be more reliable. One way I thought to do that was to normalise the number of tests by the number of death, in other words: the ∑ of tests / ∑ of Covid-19 deaths. Why? Well, because the higher that number, the more the testers would have tested outside of the hospital, and thus they are closer to the truth and have a much better picture of reality. For example, as of today Singapore has undertaken 224,262 tests for 21 deaths. With 10,679 tests undertaken against each victim of Covid-19, Singapore health authorities clearly have scanned largely beyond the victim's family, contacts and health workers. And thus, the 0.1% Covid mortality rate found in Singapore is probably much closer to the reality than countries that have undertaken possibly more tests, say Germany with 3,14 million tests, but who have only undertaken 393 tests against each victim.
I then plotted the mortality rates of a number of comparable nations against this proxy, and the visual convergence was pretty amazing to me. And I am sure it is to you too (see chart below). Though each country infection fatality rates (IFR) is/seems randomly different, the same biological/epidemiological gravity is pulling. To dissipate the randomness, I simulated mathematically a larger testing pool - using Google Sheets - I built a convergence curve (Power Series) of it all, and the mortality rate points to 0.1% as you can see for yourself (with a Rsqr 0.76). Fundamentally, this convergence curve eliminates the randomness and points to a sort of biological gravity.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...02x798.png
Having viewed a video of Chemistry Nobel Prize winner, Pr. Michael Levitt of Stanford School of Medicine, where he was explaining the early plateauing of the Covid-19 epidemic. I decided to send it to him, and he was kind enough - despite a crazy agenda around Covid - to send me a kind email saying he thought my assumptions were "very reasonable". I had another validation that this number made sense over the weekend through a wonderful exchange with my INSEAD 97J class (love you guys!). So I decided to use 0.1% mortality rate, which matches with other coronaviruses lethality and computes to 15,000 cumulated death in NYC, a curve that matches very well with reality (as of May 10, 2020).
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...15x752.png
Based on this data and analysis, New Yorkers are probably safe now as they would have attained herd immunity, specially if basic measures are taken to reduce the R0 and lower the immunity threshold.
I am sure many will find flaws to the approach I have described above. It has the benefit of existing, of being data-driven and of having multiple verification points that anchor it quite solidly. I have kept the data mostly untouched, and have triangulated it repeatedly. I am not an epidemiologist, but I am an experienced consultant trained in the scientific approach with experience in biotechnology. My purpose all along was - and still is - to try to help bring a better picture of the situation in these chaotic times. I started thinking the virus was killing 5.5%, but data, analogies with cancer growth models I had been tinkering with, combined with the scientific approach I was taught, all helped me down to the other end of the spectrum: 0.1% mortality rate. I am confident this piece of work can be replicated to other countries and cities, very quickly, and I will start doing it for my home country France.
The data and the excellent work of many researchers seem to indicate clearly that Covid-19 has spread through the world mostly unseen, and caught everybody by surprise. I hope this will help bring some clarity and bring us all closer together towards a solution.
All the best,
Marc Girardot
As you can imagine, I never imagined we’d still be where we are today knowing what I knew then. It is still unbelievable that mainstream media, public health authorities, Big Tech and major part of the population still haven’t realised how disproportionate their reaction was all along, that the protection of cross-immunity was brushed under the carpet, and that our lives were uselessly disrupted for 2 years.
Have a great weekend.
Marc
|
