03-11-2008, 02:27 PM
[user=152]AndrewX[/user] wrote:
But after I have chatted with a few people who have had consultations with him and spoke personally to him, as well as what many people here who've had consultations with him, I am reserving judgment. His story coincides with what MANY other whistleblowers have said, I cannot reject his information just because I do not like it, which was how I felt when I first read it.
As for his forum, I know nothing of it. Didn't he take it down?
Quote:You Stew lovers are all the same GeeGee. You are all of the belief that one MUST have a 'beef' with someone to not like them. I can assure you that I do not like MANY people that I have never even met or spoken with. If you find that hard to beleive you best think again. George Bush and his cronies for instance... I have not met or spoken to any of them either, if you know what I mean. The list is massive and Stew is on it - anyone who I deem to be a lair or a perverter of the truth is on it.I am not a "Stew lover" as so you so erreoneously called me. In fact, I have never bought a Swerdlow book, had a consultation, or attended one of his lectures. I actually have posted a thread here asking for people's opinions on whether he's a fraud or not, and I have quite a few other postings on him with a skeptical tone.
He condradicts himslef continually, even on his DVDs, he SCREENS all and any posts on his forum then claims our mass-media is doing it badly simpy because they too do as he does... yet another contradiction.
If he has nothing to fear, let him post all and everything that is posted in his forum without any prior censorship and then I may consider he is getting a little better. Gastapo cencorships never did them any good either.
Do you think that anything which is POSTED on this forum is censored by Rick or any other Admin personel?? This is why Rick's integrity is MUCH higher than Stew's could ever be.
We're not children and Stew best wake up to that... followed by your kind.
But after I have chatted with a few people who have had consultations with him and spoke personally to him, as well as what many people here who've had consultations with him, I am reserving judgment. His story coincides with what MANY other whistleblowers have said, I cannot reject his information just because I do not like it, which was how I felt when I first read it.
As for his forum, I know nothing of it. Didn't he take it down?