Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stargate
#81
[user=152]AndrewX[/user] wrote:
Quote:You Stew lovers are all the same GeeGee.  You are all of the belief that one MUST have a 'beef' with someone to not like them.  I can assure you that I do not like MANY people that I have never even met or spoken with.   If you find that hard to beleive you best think again.  George Bush and his cronies for instance... I have not met or spoken to any of them either, if you know what I mean.  The list is massive and Stew is on it - anyone who I deem to be a lair or a perverter of the truth is on it. 

He condradicts himslef continually, even on his DVDs, he SCREENS all and any posts on his forum then claims our mass-media is doing it badly simpy because they too do as he does... yet another contradiction. 

If he has nothing to fear, let him post all and everything that is posted in his forum without any prior censorship and then I may consider he is getting a little better.  Gastapo cencorships never did them any good either. 

Do you think that anything which is POSTED on this forum is censored by Rick or any other Admin personel??  This is why Rick's integrity is MUCH higher than Stew's could ever be. 

We're not children and Stew best wake up to that... followed by your kind.
I am not a "Stew lover" as so you so erreoneously called me. In fact, I have never bought a Swerdlow book, had a consultation, or attended one of his lectures. I actually have posted a thread here asking for people's opinions on whether he's a fraud or not, and I have quite a few other postings on him with a skeptical tone.

But after I have chatted with a few people who have had consultations with him and spoke personally to him, as well as what many people here who've had consultations with him, I am reserving judgment. His story coincides with what MANY other whistleblowers have said, I cannot reject his information just because I do not like it, which was how I felt when I first read it.

As for his forum, I know nothing of it. Didn't he take it down?
Reply

#82
You're welcome Polly... as always.:D 

I should explain Polly... I recently had dealings with 2 different users on the forum via PM's.  They were both pro Stewart and they both insisted I "state my beef" with him.  One was ok.  We spoke about things and ended it amicabley.  But the other... oh boy.LOLOL!!!  Without ever having spoken to him before, he initiates contact with me via PM and used language which you would only hear in the deepest and dirtiest of gutters around.  In fact Polly, I have kept a copy of that pm and I will send it to you via pm to amuse yourself.  Wait till you read this level of integrity and intelligence coming direct from a another Stewart lover.

LOLOL!!! 

Anyone else wanting a copy can hit me up and I'll pm it to them.
Reply

#83
Fair enough GeeGee, this is what people forget - that we all do as WE wish in the end. If you feel he can help you; by all means. If you do have a consultation or contact with him in future, feel free to post about it as time lapses after it. No doubt others would intrested in your feedback.

As for his forum... last time I was at his site it was still up. But that was quite a while ago. It wouldn't suprise me if he did pull it given that he would insist on monitoring all and deleting most all posts that were placed there... except the ones which spoke well of him. What a joke.LOLOL!!!  How can one respect anyone that behaves in that manner?
Reply

#84
The forum has been shut down. It's been down since they redid the site over a year ago.
Reply

#85
I'd comment on the forum if I had participated, but I have not so I won't say anything.
Reply

#86
Well, I don't know if the Temple on the backside of the Moon is ALSO a stargate, or HAS a stargate.

However, looks as if this "opening" has some sort of traveling function AT TIMES. And at other times, it's "empty" and used for gatherings.  I'll link all the photos I have of it.

[Image: moonwaterbase1COL.png]

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MOON/090417lunacog09.png

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...g06raw.png

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...THM250.jpg

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...Horus2.png

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...attack.jpg

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...1_1INT.jpg

But I think this "opening" when full of some liquid, serves [as you see] as a traveling medium, somehow.  That's what appears to be happening in the 2nd & 3rd photos.

:shrug:
Reply

#87
I just FOUND this very hazy, unclear photo. It looks as if it ought to be the INSIDE of that Temple.

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...mplein.jpg

And another photo I have at the DOORWAY to the Temple.

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/MO...ean03c.png

It's all very very fuzzy, and I wish I could fix it!
Reply

#88
Thanks for those pictures, shechaiyah.
Reply

#89
I think they raise more questions than they resolve, don't you?
Reply

#90
Yes, I do.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.